compcoffee

How is this about "shorts"? I thought the "longs" were all about long term thinking? Why do they claim victory after one decent quarter?

Do you realize stock price is still well below the highs? How are the shareholders winners here?

You post baseless accusations. Any motivations?

Why? Because Elon dislikes them? The stock is still way off all time highs, you appear to have a short memory.

This is called late economic cycle hysteria. No rules.

I've been through two of them, things get crazier.

The cringe was more related to "we as a society should be grateful to Apple".

It's an utterly laughable statement. Not surprised it upset a few worshipers of the Tech Overlords. Apple, the billionaires it produced and the people it employs should be grateful to the rest of society.

>just like we should be outraged by websites that sell your data without your explicit consent.

At least some of the onus is on you to be more discriminate with whom you share your data. As the sibling says, assume the worst.

It's fun to expound about "how things should be" but sometimes you have to deal with "how things actually are".

>Sure, please paste here your email and other accounts logins.

That is not privacy, it's security. Are you implying that Facebook and Google don't take security seriously?

>He literally said that we as a society should be grateful for having Apple.

Which is utterly cringeworthy.

iPhone user thinks iPhone is best thing since sliced bread. News at 11.

>The government's "stable coin" lost 96% of its value since 1913.

Most of the cryptocurrencies out there have lost that much value since January.

>stop playing the top 4 songs (of any genre) over and over and use some real music innovation and variety.

If this model could make money, they'd be doing it.

Terrestrial radio economics are such that when you tune-in (which far fewer people do nowadays) you want to hear "that new song you like".

>I'd be surprised if Bloomberg has any credibility in tech journalism

If the tech world turns their back on Bloomberg, I'll give them more credibility; not less.

>If you had an offer from Slack, would you seriously turn it down because they have Saudi money via Softbank if it was otherwise your top choice?

Of course not. The Valley runs on greed.