colourgarden
Joined 13 years ago
Joined 13 years ago
- Semantic version is not responsive (sure it looks ok but isn't optimised)
- Tailwind version has 13 inlined SVG icons (on the homepage) which increase DOM size (Semantic version has none)
- Tailwind version uses optimised markup for SEO purposes which leads to increased DOM size (<ul> list for navigation; not wrapping entire article summary in an anchor; using <dl/dt/dd> structure in work section)
This is clearly not comparing apples with apples when it comes to semantic HTML+CSS vs Tailwind.
However, most egregiously, the author goes on to make a bunch of comparisons between the Next.js tailwindui marketing site and his Nuejs-generated template for the argument that "Tailwind is bad for performance". This is deliberately misleading.
There are plenty of valid criticisms of Tailwind but it's hard not to look at this article as anything but a puff piece for the author's framework rather than a serious comparison of two approaches to building UIs.
> P.S. old.reddit.com isn’t going anywhere
Maybe there are lessons to be learned there rather than simply taking more.
> We argued they had no reason to expect to find what they were looking for and any seizures would therefore be illegal under Swedish law.
If this line is to be believed then the police would have been committing a crime by proceeding.
https://shopviu.com/en_int/viu-stores/
My partner previously also used VIU and recently had a good experience with Ace & Tate (who have been recommended already).
Not only did he realise it, he proved it. Days before launching the ship, he had 30 men run across the deck to demonstrate its stability. The ship listed badly and they stopped the demonstration before the King arrived.
How else would you expect to run a PHP-based application? WordPress also requires a PHP environment and database.
I wouldn't argue against Craft being more difficult to install than WordPress but I also wouldn't describe it as difficult (I'm a FE dev, no PHP wizard).
And I don't recall Craft every being marketed as a WordPress alternative - it's always been a "CMS for developers" (I think this may have been a tagline on their homepage at one point).