cmonreally123

"I am frequently asked for my PowerPoint slides, which basically function for me as lecture notes.'

What is this guy's problem. I frequently present to my companies C suite and I've never considered not sending them my unredacted presenters notes...If there's value in them for me why wouldn't their be value in them for others trying to learn about my topic.

The powers that can't pay? If the US, EU, Russia, China all have nukes to everything...

Usually adults both work together and play by the same rules, no? Is China working together in cases outside of this?

In prisoners dilemma tit for tat is a winning strategy for a reason.

Because if they did the 9$ ads would plummet in price paid to the platform because it implies to the advertisers the consumers have no purchasing capability and may be price sensitive or else they would shell out the extra dollar. If they don't offer it and still sell adds they can demand advertisers pay the premium as the consumer has disposable income to buy the service and is likely price insensitive since they are now paying for something that was free.

TIL. I had thought a computer reboot was snappy compared to filling those fuel tanks, that's so counterintuitive to me. That does make it more of an issue then.

What's wrong with the Boeing case on needing to be rebooted.

It doesn't seem much worse then memory leaks in missle guidance tracking systems that exceed flight time. We have finite resources, if the effort to correct is minimal what's the harm?

Why would it, not like the government has the balls to make it hurt Apple's business.

Company pays bribe for cost of doing business world shocked.

Why does Antartica use freshwater for fire fighting? Maybe I missed it the article?

Do the Australian citizens not vote their politicians into the role? It hardly seems the fault of the companies to not exploit the politicians weakness. Surely such weakness would allow a more capable candidate to campaign on such a platform.

I think you hit my points nail on the head. Automation is the upper bound, I'm not convinced on your latter point because market forces typically act before minimum wage, which I think a different comment or brought up in relation to McDonalds.

Just so it's clear I think if there is a legal solution to this it's on taxing the high end of incomes, inheritances, and capital gains, not the low end.

I buy one of TSLAs robots and remote control it from a foreign country claiming it AI.

"What is the federal minimum wage? Who benefits from it being $7.25 an hour? Not the common people"

Can you give a source on this one, you state it like it's something obvious and studied but I don't follow? I'm curious how this policy doesn't result in increased off shoring in a world where USA doesn't control 100% of resources, and a theoretical world this would result in inflation normalizing against the increased monetary supply.

For the hacker news crowd I agree, but for the average public and law I feel this at least warrants thinking about if we need additional protections as I feel the surveillance we have today and what we had when the laws were written and what the general public expects mismatch drastically.

If I get a password prompt in public am I expected to run into the nearest private property because legally I could be recorded and my input recorded and extracted ?