closetnerd

The source of about 30% of the hits I took in homework and tests was, to this day, not having memorized the basic values of Sin/Cos(pi, pi/2, pi/4).

Hierarchical model for the win. Consistent with Jeff Hawkins research as well.

I swear this comment comes across as a bot.

True...

Though I think there is more to LSD. It's fair to be skeptical. If the pitch is it's going to fix everything for everyone, or the likes, then it's definitely a lie.

Point being you gotta get your measure to the millions of other clones.

My understanding is they are all still transformers. The tweaks are more about quantization that better to generalize over data more efficiently (so less parameters requires) and improvement of the training data/process itself.

Otherwise I'd like to know specifically whats better/improved between models themselves.

I would join as well. And donate.

This is unacceptable.

My perspective here is that to do the job was going to be near impossible. No one even knows at this point how to succeed.

And if we need to learn how to succeed, the initial heuristic of applying the law is the only starting point. Failure was the expected initial result.

She can fail for the entirety of her term. We lose nothing from the status quo. But if she can stick to it - then after she's taken enough of the initial beatings, someone else can come and succeed with the learnings she provides.

Eh? She seems like the first in a very long time to actually be making a legitimate attempt at the job.

Makes her very likable.

Ah good reminder why I'm paying for the intercept.

I think I'm one that is a bit fatigued by the idea of learning a new thing w/o enough wins here.

On the other hand, the unproductive critique in all the comments makes me think everyone forgot how hard it is try to make something better.

Is there anyways to make it anonymous?

Ya I think he's actually unlike most other CEOs. The man does super unpopular decisions in front of everyone.