clarkenheim

You gave consent to see ads when you signed up. Why would the presence of an ad blocker withdraw that consent?

The words "umami flavours" is a lot more palatable than MSG.

If Facebook need to answer this question then so do Google, Twitter, Amazon and basically anyone else with a big enough footprint.

This is just as bad an idea as banning encryption to stop terrorism.

It will only be replaced with another echo chamber.

You can stop Facebook from using you as well in the EU.

this is awesome, thanks

How did you "check the orbits for your evening"? just curious, i would like to check my own from time to time and have a look on a clear night. If it is something a layman can do?

You've never been able to opt out of any of the google search algorithm features. I don't see why you we be able to opt out of this one.

I don't necessarily think this is true. Advertisers want to be able to attribute revenue to the types of ads that they show, that way they can spend less money on advertising and focus it on the channels which actually work for them. Cookies are the best way of attributing online ads to online sales.

TL;DR they want effective attribution, not to wreck your browsing experience.

The features in Safari only harms the smaller companies who's domain is not in the visited sites list. the behemoths like Google who always have a first party cookie dont have a problem with the feature and therefore get even more control over online advertising.

A couple of those are not the same. When it happens by genuine accident it is not the same as vandalism.

Would love to see an attempt at one of these for the British Isles.

i could not agree more. Ohhh these Strawberries look great.... taste like water