clankyclanker

Joined 6 years ago

Karma
628
Submissions
204
Member since
Aug 14
Need to get in touch? (name)@(domain)

Domain: despisinggravity.com

Name: indoorvoices55

View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 1 year ago
Does anybody have insider details on how HP killed the Memrister? I'd be fascinated to read that, too.
Comment · 2 years ago
Comment · 2 years ago
Comment · 2 years ago
That seems optimistic. I would instead expect that those VIPs would be added to a table of folks who don't get tickets, codifying the current semi-formal process.
Comment · 2 years ago
…but, like drowning, plane crashes aren’t infectious.

There might be something to your analogy if a crash in Boise caused everyone in town to come down with a plane to the head, but that’s not how that works so it’s kind of apples to oranges.

Comment · 2 years ago
Comment · 2 years ago
* Representative
Comment · 2 years ago
Then you file a complaint with your favorite reordenarías because somebody skirted the GDPR?
Comment · 2 years ago
Isn’t that usually called extortion?
Comment · 2 years ago
Agreed, I only picked up reading again after finding Libby.

(A short story about how cheating the user with exorbitant prices results in the exit of your audience.)

Comment · 2 years ago
I don’t think that’s quite the takedown of the gp you might it is; copyright doesn’t really ensure any of those things. It looks like think you’re conflating a few things here, particularly attribution and profit. I don’t think copyright guarantees either.

The gp was speaking about the purpose behind creating copyright, which is to produce the maximum number of works, while you were looking at the results to the author, the goals of recognition and payment.

Only specific representations are protected: non-derivative readaptations are generally permitted (the thorny issue is whether it is derivative or not: c.f. Disney vs Pixar). Additionally, the US specifically avoids guaranteeing profits for works by endorsing “sweat-of-the-brow” or effort-based value judgements. Doing otherwise is an implicit validation of communism: to each according to their effort, which is counter to the distribution policy under capitalism.

Comment · 2 years ago
Comment · 2 years ago
pdftk?
Comment · 2 years ago
(If that's the case I'm thinking of) it was actually documented as a challenge to export restrictions, mocking them was merely a pleasant byproduct.

The EFF's legal challenge was essentially that if crypto is a munition, then this printed book explaining the crypto is also at least as much of a munition, if not more so. They gave the judge the choice between deciding that a printed book is some sort of deadly tool, or deciding that crypto wasn't conceptually a munition. Strangely, the judge ruled in the EFF's favor.

Comment · 2 years ago
I'm around there and am interested in adding new trees to my yard. If you're serious, drop me an email.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton