cjbprime

They did a specific-hardware kernel optimization for the Pro 6000 (available on AWS as g7e).

Cool! I went to a LAN party in a retired nuclear bunker in 2000. I remember someone had one of the first TFT screens. It was muddy, had zero visibility unless you were directly head on, and what felt like around 3fps. They were trying to play Counter-Strike. (Everyone else had a CRT and laughed at it.)

Looks like its only for 16/32-bit ops, which are almost irrelevant to LLM inference, but are relevant to training.

Is your argument that it would be really bad if it was true, therefore it's not going to be true? It would be really bad if I got cancer, but I don't respond to that by refusing to think rationally about it.

It has particularly good observability (the ability to see the full content of every prompt and response and tool call) compared to other harnesses, that's the main thing that stood out to me.

> I’m more and more convinced that all of AI engineering is Neijuan (内卷, meaning curl inwards). In China it describes a system that demands ever more effort and competition without improving output

I don't know what to say, except that articles exactly like this one have been showing up constantly for the last three years, and literally all of them were obviously outdated and irrelevant within about a month.

It could be literally automated. And I'm talking about while they were still minutes away on approach, not during final landing.

And yet I am! Care to elaborate?

I mean, complete ethical nihilism is one way to try to avoid losing this particular argument, but I don't think you'll get many people to agree with you on it.

Maybe ATC could be expected to revoke landing clearance on extremely obviously unstable approaches? I wonder why that didn't happen.

They made a series of at least ten (and that's kind of charitable) this-must-never-happen mistakes that likely rise to the level of extraordinary criminal negligence, including ignoring checklists, alarms, configuring the plane for landing in general, and basically everything related to safety.

You don't have to extend sympathy, just as you don't have to extend sympathy to drunk drivers who kill people.

> LLMs can't read binary directly without a disassembler.

They totally can. They're remarkably competent at disassembly.

The tokens spent to find the vulnerabilities will cost money, and the attackers will usually find themselves more financially incentivized to spend money on finding the vulnerabilities than the defenders.

If it was a mechanical keyboard with that case instead of an entire computer they could charge twice as much for it.

Waaait what? That's both crazy and crazy useful.