Recent submissions

Comment · 1 year ago
Comment · 1 year ago
The Carnot limit is the theoretical upper limit of the efficiency of a heat pump, so the stated number is presumably with respect to that, not heat moved per unit energy input like you're quoting.
Comment · 1 year ago
If it's true that more phones will allow people to be more productive, that increase in productivity should show up in GDP as well
Comment · 1 year ago
I don't think there'll be any significant drop on a sub-decade timescale unless there's some kind of financial crisis, but the ideal kind of trend is prices stagnating or growing slower than wages, which is the case right now - and the question is whether it will continue.

I think there is a good chance it will, as long as a change of government doesn't deliberately dismantle the current approach. Yes there's population growth and yet prices have been stagnant or declining the past few years and construction has picked up. That's a good trend!

I'm not familiar with the situation with public housing but am happy to accept if the government has failed there. But this seems like a separate failure rather than an indictment of their approach to increasing supply generally which I think is working.

Comment · 1 year ago
Comment · 1 year ago
They'll show up in the diff.

Grep will find them too, but any in the diff you'll know for sure were added by you.

Comment · 1 year ago
Comment · 1 year ago
Based on the other examples of random inputs not being sufficient, I dare say the fish-based attempt may have been fraudulent.
Comment · 1 year ago
It took me to the end of your comment to realise the crucial bit I was missing: that they're talking about implementing the CPU on an FPGA.

As opposed to, say, interfacing with an FPGA which could be totally different way to be "FPGA-friendly".

Comment · 1 year ago
They had some Starlink simulators they were planning to deploy (to a suborbital trajectory, to re-enter along with the ship) this launch.
Comment · 1 year ago
Comment · 2 years ago
If you're talking about "whalebait" markets on manifold, that's a bit disingenuous - these are markets where the thing you're betting about is related to trading behaviour itself, i.e. self-referential markets.

I don't disagree that the one french dude betting 30M on Trump on polymarket showed that there isn't enough liquidity in such markets for such distortions to be corrected, but whalebait on Manifold is not really related.

Comment · 2 years ago
They've actually been having to dump propellant in order to more accurately test what a Starship in orbit would be like, given they're not flying with a payload that would consume that propellant on ascent, but that they still want to launch with a full tank.

The dumping of this excess propellant actually caused an explosion and loss of vehicle on the second test flight.

Comment · 2 years ago
That is indeed what you get with tidal forces - bodies closer than geostationary orbit lose angular momentum and decay inward, bodies further out steal angular momentum from Earth and move outward.

I suppose the same effect is there with satellites much smaller than the moon, but it would be tiny.

Comment · 2 years ago
This might be what you meant, but the ordered dicts are faster, no? I believe ordering was initially an implementation detail that arose as part of performance optimisations, and only later declared officially part of the spec.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton