chrisrogers

The billionaire class can do those things, but they don't have to. Same with non-celebrity Royalty.

0.5% is a far cry from a rounding error..

My read is that it's immoral because it's a surveillance hijack without the knowledge of the users, as opposed to an opt-in.

That get covered by the mechanisms of social credibility.

Louisiana had them like 7 years ago

One of the implementations underwent analysis.

Sounds a bit like IRC to be honest.

Eye tracking will probably lose the productivity metric, though. When you remove the ability to look at one thing and interact with another, you get farther from the way that humans tend to interact with their immediate physical environment.

I can cut vegetables without looking at them. I can use that dynamic to offset the planning and acting phases of my thought process. Falling short of that efficiency will feel limiting.

I'd use a large chain and the beefiest lock you can manage. The sort of thing you'd use to lock up a motorcycle.

Don't forget the far more common access barrier. The White House press room and its analogues only hold so many people.

ACH replaced real clearing houses. Some banks have implemented rapid low-fee transactions, but not all. It's not unreasonable to assume that banks will widely implement an ACH replacement that makes this advantage of cryptocurrency exchange irrelevant.

It's a joke about the uniform

Yeah for this you would need to sign up using a one-use mailbox, pay by mailing in a cashier's check, atop hiding your traffic. Possible with the NY Times, at least.

Masks are critical for dampening the potential for spread. The goal is not entirely to mitigate risk for the kid themselves, but of spread to their household that leads to increased likelihood of deaths.

Depends on the scope of the API of course, but it's a good rule of thumb for any API with private auth