Recent submissions

Comment · 23 days ago
Yup! First class
Comment · 24 days ago
I do all my AI assisted development on my $10/mo Racknerd box. I don't use herdr, maybe I should, but a 20-minute vibe-coded tmux visor is more than I need for keeping track of multiple lanes of development and letting them run autonomously. I also wired up some pi skills to let them send me emails if they're blocked or have questions, etc.

That, plus tailscale and Secure Shellfish on my iPhone and I can vibe code from anywhere.

Comment · 1 month ago
You could say all chaotic alignments are misalignments, but not all misalignments are chaotic.
Comment · 9 months ago
> Those who disrespect my countries law do not deserve to benefit from my great country.

Why? All laws or only some?

> Well they clearly aren't trying hard enough if they are in the country without a proper visa.

This reads as an uninformed statement.

Comment · 9 months ago
>This is systematically not true as citizens can not be legally deported.

And yet.

>If someone is not a citizen and are here illegally they should be removed, no matter their intentions. If you are willing to break the law to stay here, I personally don't want them back in the country.

Without even getting into the subject of kids who are brought here.. I just have to say, why? Immigrants are net contributors in the US. Many of these people who are here "illegally" are in a bureaucratic maze and are attempting to follow the rules. Some aren't, sure, but we live in a society where we don't draconianly punish people for a certain level of breaking the rules in cases where there is no real harm done. And I say deportation, particularly to 3rd country like the USA is doing now sometimes, qualifies as very draconian.

Comment · 1 year ago
not being motivated enough to vote against != support in terms of claiming a popular mandate. If I just don't care who wins, you can't say I support either candidate.

At most you could say my inaction prevented the winner from losing I guess.

Comment · 1 year ago
Eh. You can’t claim the non voters all implicitly support him though since they didn’t know the outcome ahead of time. I’ll agree they didn’t sufficiently oppose him ahead of the 2nd time to bother voting. But that’s far from support.
Comment · 1 year ago
49.5% of 65% of eligible voters voted for him.. hardly a majority any way you slice it, either of voters or of the broad population.
Comment · 1 year ago
And to add: the new features are take or leave it. you're right, who cares about new features on _twitter_, it was ossified already.

Becoming the worst place on earth is a far weightier outcome of the aquisition and firings.

Comment · 1 year ago
I dont know; they may well have been on the ads and moderation side. And they did add the hangouts/voice calls stuff, but that may have been an acquisition, I'm not sure.
Comment · 1 year ago
On the other hand while yes it's still running, twitter is mostly not releasing new features, and has completely devolved into the worst place on the internet. Not to mention most accounts now actually are bots like Elon claimed they were 3 years ago.
Comment · 1 year ago
Isn’t it to sell home currency denominated debt…?
Comment · 1 year ago
I am certain you can find more than one quote of his relating to Project 2025. In any event this also doesn't disagree with what I said more broadly, which is, he was not forthright about his plan to do exactly what Project 2025 said, so you can't say he's doing exactly what he said. But anyone with a hint of insight could understand that was his plan.

I'm responding to someone who said Trump is doing what he SAID he would do, and that is all I intended to correct.

Comment · 1 year ago
Obviously
Comment · 1 year ago
That’s exactly right and what I said. The guy above said Trump is doing what he said he would. He isn’t.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton