Recent submissions

Comment · 2 years ago
Lucky
Comment · 2 years ago
Tech senior
Comment · 2 years ago
Could it be muscle loss?
Comment · 2 years ago
I really disliked the book. Probably one of the worst books I’ve ever read.

Some times HN shows well-written and researched blog pieces about events or characters in scientific history. This book felt like the author read a bunch of these and put them together in a book. Then the reality-fantasy aspect of it makes no sense to me.

Why did you like it?

Comment · 2 years ago
Comment · 2 years ago
That page is a bit marketing
Comment · 2 years ago
One of the things I don't like about the Julia ecosystem is the monolithic libraries that have tons of dependencies. DiffEq is one of those. I think its fine to write a script but if you want to develop something more sophisticated, you want to keep your dependencies lean.
Comment · 2 years ago
Im not sure if Julia will ever take off. Right now there are huge investments in the AI space and Julia has no presence in those.
Comment · 2 years ago
Is it? Chatgpt and variants are a great product at least. I use it every day. My wife (nontech) also does it.
Comment · 2 years ago
I’m sure this question has been asked plenty of times but what is the best place to start with LLMs (no theory, just installing them locally, fine tuning them, etc)
Comment · 2 years ago
Is this bad for research?
Comment · 3 years ago
I pasted paragraphs from old academic papers (90s) and gave me 97-100% AI generated. Have you even tested this?
Comment · 3 years ago
That part about Gibson doing a documentary is not true. Just Google it.
Comment · 3 years ago
Publishing is a social activity. And, today, a bad metric to measure research success. It has been hijacked by careerists and mafiosi.
Comment · 3 years ago
Pretty good!

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton