chb

This. A thousand times this. It's as if Opus can only communicate in a glib, software engineering vernacular that presumes domain-specific knowledge and uses jargon accordingly.

Am I the only one who thinks the ending is a non-sequitur? How is the hackneyed, "the kids are allright" [sic] related to the preceding content?

>Click here to see the "how this was made" feature

^ at the bottom of the article

This. And the "individual with technical savvy saving his child-like clients" scenario described earlier in this thread is delusional and Dilbertian.

What “modern platform” would you suggest?

First I saw that it's written in Perl. Then I realized that the last release was 11 years ago and that the repository domains are hardcoded in the one-file script.

So was Trump being inclusive or exclusive when he renamed the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America?

Is it possible that the supply of used GPUs available to home builders will somehow increase as the result of this?

How does dot.bs make money? The about page and FAQ don’t explain what they’re monetizing.

A gross mischaracterization of the author's point (the word "type" doesn't even appear in the article). The author focuses on the cost of interpreted languages, which he describes as "memory hungry" and computationally expensive.