charlieyu1

I just don’t know why we are using a verification that is hard to read and write for humans

A lot of code is certainly not written careful enough. Plenty examples of plaintext passwords storage in the wild.

Is it even accessible in the UK?

It’s the same for 2026

IPv6 is 16 bytes, the person I replied to gives a 8 bytes scheme

Not enough supply/demand. AWS charge like $0.005/hr per IPv4 address

Not using hex is a plus I guess?

Regular people don’t even upgrade to Win 10/11 unless they are forced to.

I do it like how I handle error messages: one at a time. Maybe 2-3 if the work is easy. Often enough to find new directions or uncover new problems and the suggestion list doesn’t work anymore.

Both left and right are shit these days. Politics tend to attract the worst people, psychopaths who seek for manipulation. This happens to both sides.

Wait till they realise they are liable for LLM mistakes

I interviewed at a job with quite a lot of maths to do. I never worked in that industry, but I made a good profolio using Jupyter notebooks so I got an interview. Turns out everything was done in Excel, they asked me a few times how good I was with Excel. It seems they are not impressed with an answer of “Yea, that’s easy, I do my personal budgeting with it”

Ease of comprehension is not prioritised in training. I doubt frontier labs would spend enough money to train on something that is non-measurable and subjective.

I don’t think it would have any effect at human scale

I have seen way more malice pretending to be just stupid than the actual stupidity