cee_el123
Joined 9 years ago
Joined 9 years ago
although the language of that Brookings article is obscure ( possibly deliberately )
it seems like he's nitpicking rather than acknowledging something's deeply wrong.
plus it's strange the way he quotes himself in 3rd person in the article he himself wrote
they're also a big part of how humans fulfil the basic necessities of life
why should this "ownership" gained centuries ago through violence or social rank, be the reason for the average person of today having pay 50% of their wages in tribute to the descendant of that original conqueror/noble ?
> believing where they are due to well executed systemic conspiracies rather than their mistakes, missteps, or a simple lack of motivation or ability
the implication certainly is that if you don't make mistakes, missteps, work hard and have talent - in other words if you are full of merit - you'll assuredly end up in a good place
sounds like saying we live in a meritocracy
I am one of those people who certainly missed the boat due to my own missteps, mistakes, lack of motivation
But let's talk about those who don't/didn't have the favourable circumstances and opportunities I had/have
Is not being able to afford / be-accepted-for a life changing college degree that person's fault 50% of the time ? is it their parents' fault ? is it the grandparents' fault that the parents weren't better off ? if so ... where does this blame game stop ? at some point govt/society needs to step in and give you a boost regardless of your background
debatably, inheritance & land ownership are well executed systemic conspiracies
mistakes, missteps, lack of motivation, are all fine - but "lack of ability" ? you're arguing against yourself there - if there is such a thing as lack of ability - that's certainly a terrible reason to disqualify a person from having their basic needs met
This is an unaffiliated version looks like https://apps.apple.com/us/app/live-transcribe/id1471473738