cdibona
Joined 18 years ago
Joined 18 years ago
They subsequently shuttered Atlanta and it would take five or more years before they'd allow engineers there again.
It was very Google. Lost some truly talented (Hi Bruce!) software engineers who would go on to make terrific software elsewhere.
Id imagine there's something similar in Houston, this stuff is legit fascinating.
Since it was open source and developed in public ,the itar folks determined it was okay to release.
The whole point of the final rulings in the oracle/google trial is that is indeed copywritten by the author, but fair use. So source code stanzas that are ...well...totally banal or generic aren't actually suddenly not covered by copyright, but the argument you'd make (after fourteen years in court in googles case) is that it is fair use, wether that copyright is under open source or proprietary licenses.
There isn't a magical ability to declare something a derivative work when it isn't, just because it's open source/copyleft.
That said, when engineers or pms came to me asking to remove copyright attribution, I almost always said no.
I run a game company developing http://fracturedveil.com and help governments, film/tv productions and companies worldwide on issues related to technology, open source and manufacturing.