cbsmith

Agreed, though this appears to be much more than open weights.

Missed opportunity to say "Kinds of kindness". ;-)

Yeah, but only the Rust guys are right. ;-)

What could possibly go wrong? ;-)

I kind of like the whole Paramount acquisition as something that is just going to drag them down.

Anyone else immediately think "Clippy for developers".

I thought we all moved over to Niquests and/or aiocquic and HTTP/3 these days.

"my bet is that close to no one knows what the acronym BDD stands for".

That's disconcerting. Software engineers ought to know.

As a guy named Chris Smith, I can tell you, people do absolutely "match people on first and last name", and it causes me no end of trouble.

> I don’t know if that’s true. More schooling does not mean more trustworthy or careful doctors. And I suspect some negative trait selection.

The medical boards are well aware of this, which is why the standards are far more than just about having more schooling.

I am familiar with Friendman's dissertation, and while the economic claims it makes are solid, it isn't a take down about the medical impact of the boards. It really doesn't say one thing or another about them. Let's put it this way: if you are going to inflate the cost of a service, it's hard if the quality of the service is terrible and easily replicated by someone else.

Everything old is new again. ;-)

The article concedes that there is a minimum power consumption. Thinking that therefore defines your generation strategy (e.g. I will have plants that constantly generate that minimum amount and the rest I'll handle with separate peak plants) is a myth.

...because they have other goals beyond reduce carbon emissions.

Better a financial barrier than a physical one. If satellites and spaceships are literally smashing in to each other, I have a hard time interpreting it as anything other than a regulatory failure.

Are there other OSS LLMOps projects that have overtaken you? I couldn't think of one.