cblconfederate

that s the size of the smallest mobile app

They don't. not only are the users not having ownership of their content and distribution, there is also censorship

When you build something a lot of people use, it will require a lot of ducttape. Software represents the diversity of its users.

They should never do that. People who want walled gardens should go with a rented solution from one of those website builder companies

It's just great to see work on self-hosted cms, and PHP nevertheless, the easiest one to host. Open source has forgotten the art of making the web open to everyone, not just to BigTech employees.

are there narrow streets in america?

One needs good enough, not superior

I wish they did the same for governments and lawmakers

mysql is also trending down

Do they really want people to find jobs or keep searching ?

I don't have a mental model for "64 pounds". Apparently, it s the weight of a 9 year old, which would ve been a better unit of measure.

> X-but-GDPR-compliant

That market does not exist, it will never make money (maybe from leeching the public sector but everyone makes some scraps there). In fact the idea that laws will create a market was a bad idea.

It would be nice if we had the option to ask for $1 to our visitors, but we don't because the credit card and payments racket works its magic. Just what are websites supposed to do to survive? Shutting down is not a valid answer

Of course the #1 culprits are the advertisers themselves, because they don't care about their craft, they are lazy and just push all their money to google. But the web should be like an arcade machine where people can pay to get content, and current regulation makes that impossible

It's hard to participate. It's good for finding interesting ideas and people, but participating is a job on its own , since everything seems to attract the wrong people. Too public, too much anxiety

I don't think the small ones are much better. It's all about signaling and politics everywhere.