catchnear4321
Joined 4 years ago
Joined 4 years ago
If one wants to provide why, there are replies for that.
It’s a qualitative instrument, making it quantitative will change the use. Meanwhile, abuse always finds a way.
Attacking the analogy doesn’t resolve the actual uncertainty. Which is the difference between what we are doing. You insist certainty. I’m insisting that’s a bit silly.
you just destroyed the antenna and you claim the station is gone.
sure, sure, you will insist the burden of proof is on me, or suggest more violent imagery, or both.
you didn’t actually want to engage.
Shouting “brigading” doesn’t do much to change that.
It also ignores the impact of upvotes, which can be used to the same effect, yet doesn’t receive the same request.
To the average consumer, obsessing over scroll feeling not completely perfect is a distraction from watching the next Avengers movie, if not downright neurotic behavior.
To a prosumer, the value may be obvious but the price may not be worth it. Which can lead to a distaste for the company, for not being a more accommodating company.
To a professional, if you need it, you need it, and you begrudgingly pay for it. Because you need it.
I don’t even know what my phone screen has. Wasn’t why I bought the pro at the time. Wanted the additional ram. So I wouldn’t feel as pressed to upgrade now. (Prosumer, aka neurotic.)
> Our first model-kernel combos
so it’s a bit worse than “wrong.”
yes that’s what he’s saying, if consumers had less memory, his would be better.