captainepoch

> There was no ill intent by evil corporation, but rather a desire to support functionality that some customers expect of VS Code w.r.t. AI-generated code. As folks mentioned here - many similar tools do this as well.

Then make it an extension, not a IDE-behaviour thing. Is that so complicated, so difficult?

Ladybird is doomed with this.

I hope Brave deletes this from Chromium if it's present in the source code.

It's useful, but it's a meaningless feature.

We've been asking for a good JS and HTML engine, faster than what Firefox uses, and for better compatibility with websites (there are webs that don't work properly with Firefox). And to not put the Manifest V3 into Firefox (which it's done already, besides we still have uBlock Origin working as intended, for now, because nobody knows what's going to happen with that in the future).

And I think that's way more important that being able to group tabs.

So... Nothing really useful or what users are asking for a long time...

And we then ask why people aren't using Firefox...

I moved long ago, I don't regret anything.

For now, there isn't an alternative. Maybe a Pixel phone and GrapheneOS with the sandboxed Play Store would be the only choice, but for now, nobody knows.

If you want a hardened version of Firefox, download LibreWolf.

> Where in the real world is anonymity considered ok?

It should be everywhere, no matter the place or the platform.

The day people stop inventing stuff like that and they put the same effort in do really good, quality code... That day, we might start having decent software and not Electron or React apps everywhere...

God bless old times when programmers cared about quality rather than stuff like this... "vive coding"... My God...

The only thing Mozilla has right now better than Chrome is that the APIs needed for uBlock Origin to work as intented exist.

I think exactly the same. It's always the same play.

I guess they don't want to listen to things they need to pour money into.

Read the comments from Lio and skywal_l, both replies to your comment <- that's what I mean.

So... Here's an idea: stop wasting time and money on things like that, listen to the community, hire engineers, and make a browser that can be at the same level as Chrome. We already told you what we want and need, no need to keep asking.

Mozilla and the story on "How to waste money and resources" is getting tiresome at this point.

Mozilla has already millions of dollars than can be put into Firefox's development instead of the business they're getting into. It doesn't need even more money, it just needs to put part of it into engineers who would make Firefox what we need.