Recent submissions

Comment · 4 days ago
>Our problem is that the press isn’t doing their job ...

Well, it's practically impossible to get a person to do something when their paycheck depends on their not doing it.

Comment · 4 days ago
Maybe when Steven Pruitt starts hallucinating facts we can make the "both sides" argument. But until then....
Comment · 25 days ago
>Purely rhetorical--with sugar cane being so dominant, why are we turning corn into corn syrup again?

The same reason we sold a "whale oil" replacement for lamps as "food". Money. It always comes down to money.

Comment · 25 days ago
I think he's using "rest of the world" sized people and not "american sized" ones.
Comment · 27 days ago
> Two dozen of largest enterprises and unicorns and so on. Nobody wanted the billing department "inline" of systems controls.

And of course, two dozen enterprises trump hundreds if not thousands of other small businesses right? Did AWS think of, oh I don't know, a 'feature flag' or somesuch thing that enterprises and unicorns are so fond of to provide this feature to those who don't have VC money to flush?

Comment · 1 month ago
But it's nice to point out to youngins who may not realize how "embrace and extend" worked historically.
Comment · 1 month ago
I know. I'm still upset about being unable to be "happy and gay".
Comment · 1 month ago
don't forget the "auto reset all consent flags to 'allowed'" oopsie bug.
Comment · 1 month ago
>Luddites have existed since the dawn of times:

Pet peeve - luddites had never been against technology. They had been against using low paid inexperienced grunt workers to displace well paid experts.

See: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/what-the-luddites-rea...

    As the Industrial Revolution began, workers naturally worried about being displaced by increasingly efficient machines. But the Luddites themselves “were totally fine with machines,” says Kevin Binfield, editor of the 2004 collection Writings of the Luddites. They confined their attacks to manufacturers who used machines in what they called “a fraudulent and deceitful manner” to get around standard labor practices. “They just wanted machines that made high-quality goods,” says Binfield, “and they wanted these machines to be run by workers who had gone through an apprenticeship and got paid decent wages. Those were their only concerns.”
Comment · 2 months ago
> Mark "they trust me; dumb fucks" Zuckerberg

There's also Mark "company over country" Zuckerberg.

Comment · 2 months ago
Comment · 2 months ago
I had to replace a fire alarm last week, so sometimes they do shriek at us at all hours!
Comment · 3 months ago
Yay capitalism! Imagine how much value is being created for shareholders by this destruction! Another example of "great work" being done!

Jokes aside, I don't know what I would do in this situation either. Maybe find a way to mark "rare" or "out of print" books and sell/auction the "pages"? Or make the scanned book available via some mechanism?

Comment · 3 months ago
>please, you're dramatically overestimating who gives a shit about this.

And you're underestimating how much of a shit you need to give about this.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton