c0m
Joined 3 years ago
Joined 3 years ago
It's pretty shocking that someone in the industry so long thinks that OSS maintainers owe him anything though, or that he didn't think to simply fork his own version - he must know this is an option. He's probably read the MIT license at some point in his career - has he never stopped to think about what to provide something 'as-is' means? His position suggests that he has the resources available to do a lot of things that were far less embarrassing than asking someone who owes him nothing to make his job easier.
If the maintainer said "I'm not releasing this until you grant me a support contract", maybe that would be extortion. Until then, he's simply getting the service he pays for.
I'm expanding my skillset from just programming and trading to include generative AI, currently making a mentoring companion to language learning. I've got strong soft skills from years working in care. I'm seeking junior trading roles or internships, or a similar career where risk is thought about a lot.
Location: Ireland
Remote: No preference
Willing to relocate: Anywhere in the world, UK + Irish citizenship
Technologies: Python w/ Jupyter notebooks and dataviz libraries, ChatGPT, C#
Résumé/CV: https://medium.com/@c0m/learning-the-business-of-risk-a1d69dda915a
Email: hn [AT] omaolain [DOT] com
I think this is solvable by having some kind of betting token that itself accrues interest over time to reduce the opportunity cost but if regulators already don’t like prediction markets boy they especially wouldn’t like that.