bsurmanski
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
If you think their response will reign inflation in check, we'll probably see the market 'crash' and a recession like the late 80s.
If you think their response will be soft, and persistent inflation is the new norm, we'll probably see the market act more like the 70s.
Maybe they walk the line, but I don't see how that's possible. Monetary policy is just so of-the-mark right now.
Another screwball is WFH. That could sap demand for large cities and push demand in suburbs and smaller towns.
function randomInt(n) {
return Math.floor(Math.random() * n);
}
function randomPassword() {
let letters = 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ';
let digits = '0123456789';
let punctuation = '!"#$%&\'()\*+,-./:;<=>?@[\\]^_`{|}~';
let s = letters.repeat(7) + digits.repeat(4) + punctuation.repeat(3);
let length = 14;
let res = Array.from({length}, (() =>
s[randomInt(s.length)])).join('');
return res;
}
looks like it's 14 characters long, and each character has an independent 72.8% / 8% / 19.2% chance of being a random letter / digit / punctuation. There are 94 symbols total, so 94^14 possible solutions; roughly 92 bits of entropy. Even if you assume 10 letters, 1 digit, 3 punctuations (the "likely" distribution) it's still 75 bits of entropy. You might be able to gain an advantage through knowledge of the PRNG state, but the PRNG in v8 (xorshift128+) has a period of 2^128 - 1.So not great odds...
The Z5 is better for baby pictures.
The d5600 is still better for hiking and travel pictures.
The Z5 is better under low-light and dynamic subject conditions. Particularly because the digital viewfinder is clearer in the dark, the eye/face autofocus and low light autofocus performance is much better (much fewer missed shots), the Z5 has sensor-shift stabilization, and there is no mirror slap affecting lower shutter speeds. For landscapes where there is lots of light, a lightweight and battery conservative d5600 still does the job excellently.
Just because the USA has federal administration that doesn't want to act on climate change right now doesn't mean that it won't get a greener administration in the future.
As for being a lost cause, isn't it preferable to minimize the effect, at least? would you rather the sea levels go up by 2.0 meters or 1.5 meters?
(1) might be solvable with an online curriculum, but (2) requires an evaluation or end-game credential to force me to do it.
Other than that, as you mentioned an even bigger benefit was social, the shared experiences with others, and the cross pollination of ideas from these other people
I don't think I was ever taught it. I think I just discovered it playing around in the water one day.
The biggest problem is the user now owns liability. With a credit card, if someone steals your card you can call up the provider and get the charges reversed. Without a centralized authority, if something goes wrong with your bitcoin account your out of luck.
Other than that, its somewhat inconvenient to get your hands on it. BTC exchanges feel a little shady. And it's not as private as you'd think. All of your transactions are public.
On the plus side, you don't need a credit card provider to bless your business, so sketchy or illegal businesses are free to transact online now. And lastly, it's decoupled from any one government. But that's not a benefit unless you live in a volatile region.
Computer Engineering Graduate from the University of Ottawa, Canada
Software Engineer at Google
Working on the OWL programming language: https://github.com/bsurmanski/wlc
twitter: bsurmanski