brutal_chaos_

What was your prompt for the image? Apologies if this should be obvious.

Hey, wanna potential future at something amazong while you work for free (basically)? /s

I love that NASA is hiring, I worry this is because NASA doesn't have funding.

BattleEye kernel module in 3 2...

I believe it's a bit more nuanced than that. Both democrats and republicans have had enough power to make meaningful changes to prevent such a wealth gap and thus the wealthy play both parties. I do see democrats trying to help people have a better life (medicare for all, etc), but the wealth gap grew nometheless. Though I do agree with you that republicans don't seem to give a flying fuck about the people these days, which does make it worse IMHO. Regardless, both parties enabled the wealth gap and is why the fight is the 99.99% against the 0.01%. The US needs to kill citizens united and take money out of politics, I think that'd be a huge step forward...and yet, it is basically impossible because the 0.01% have the power.

To be fair, you don't need to slay giants to be a viable product.

For forms of income. E.g. with paid apps/gadgets/tools for everyday use (outside of dev tools) with chatgpt embedded.

These comments: Citations needed

> What else were you expecting?

some of us were hoping for actual innovation, not more ads

The article has an upfront agenda-so at least it's honest in some regard?

they can give the tv powers to autoconnect to public/open networks and can partner with companies like Comcast to get more access points. It's best not to buy a smart TV

Why does it need to be on the web? Maybe I've missed something, can I run this locally?