brianlweiner
Joined 13 years ago
Joined 13 years ago
Nearly ever new technology introduced at places I've worked was because someone was keen to get it onto their resume.
70% of that is for livestock feed.
https://www.sparkpost.com/ https://www.cloudtamer.io/ https://www.contrastsecurity.com/
A few off the top of my head. I'm currently working (remotely) for a BigCo that acquired my startup employer last year.
Technical.ly can be a good resource for local postings. I've worked as a SWE in Baltimore for 10 years and have never had employment issues. I don't quite make SV money, but I make solid 6 figures and can afford a very nice home on just my salary and send my kids to private school, etc.
-- Early in the pandemic, travel was way down. Rental car companies unloaded a lot of their fleet that were sitting idle. Now that demand is back up, they are back on the market for vehicles.
-- Semiconductor shortages: automobile manufacturers cut their orders in early 2020 anticipating a decline in demand. That decline never happened, so they're now now able to obtain sufficient chips for new vehicle manufacturing. Thus a decline in new car availability that might push some car-buyers onto the secondary market.
I pushed back in class quite a bit about his 'End of Science' claims, and we disagreed frequently - but his actual claims are usually not as strong as they're made out to be. He simply doesn't see the same sort of practical gains being made from scientific research that we were making in the 19th and early 20th century.
If we look at the research being produced by obviously impressive scientific endeavors like LHC - I think you can see his point. We're obviously gaining knowledge, and negative results are still valuable, but we're investing more and more to make incremental progress in many fields and the actual research is becoming less and less accessible to the average person.
Anyway, it's not my job to defend John's work (he's more than capable of responding to critics) but I always found him to be interesting, patient and encouraging to his students. His class was one of my favorites and even if I disagree with his claims overall I don't think they deserve to be dismissed so readily.
I got the impression they were a group of people that broadly understood their problems and were finding it very difficult to steer the city towards good solutions.
Although Mr. Johnson was the City's Director of IT, realistically he had very nominal oversight over many of the city's actual IT departments - which were spread across a series of departments with their own employees, budgets, and resources. This was something he had been actively trying to improve but with limited progress.
I don't know what the best solution is - their hiring process is flawed and it's difficult to remove or replace problem employees. The budget is about 60% of what it probably needs to be and there's no path towards improving it.
Certainly providing the menu that might exonerate you is probably fine -- but that's what a lawyer is for.