bradhe

Interestingly reading No Rules Rules right now which spends a lot of time talking about layoffs in Reed's previous company.

That's, like, the whole country...

anyone got a non-paywalled version of this article with quite the fear-mongering title?

I was just thinking the same thing lol. 2A is such a divisive topic.

> due to LLM sloppers pushing large amounts of trash code

hey bud your bias is showing

Nice this is going to be a fun project to watch for 2 weeks before everyone forgets about it!

Current month $13,648,114,178,401.01 188,253,226,212%

Forecasted month end $18,729,381,032,152.4

Apparently my company owes the combined GDP of France, Germany, and UK to AWs.

Tower (tower.dev) | Senior Backend / Platform Engineer | London or Berlin | HYBRID | Full-time

Tower is a Python-native serverless data platform. Data teams write plain Python, and we handle packaging, dependency resolution, scheduling, and execution across a serverless runtime built on Apache Iceberg. There's no clusters to manage, no YAML to write, no pipelines to rewrite to fit someone else's engine. If you've ever wanted your local Python script to just run in production at scale without a Databricks detour, that's the product.

We're a small, senior team split between London and Berlin. We've built a lot of tech: Custom run dispatch service, multi-region routing, storage based on Apache Iceberg, and the runtime itself, to name a few. This is deep systems work--things like scheduling, distributed execution, and performance. We're not gluing SaaS together.

Stack: Go and Rust for the platform, Python everywhere it matters, Kubernetes (EKS + Karpenter) on AWS, RDS Postgres, ElastiCache Redis, S3/Iceberg, WorkOS for auth.

Looking for:

* strong distributed-systems fundamentals

* comfort owning a system end to end

* taste for correctness under load

Bonus: data-platform, query-engine, or Iceberg experience; async Rust; Kubernetes internals.

Apply / questions: Email in bio — mention HN.

Wild to me that this is on the Snowflake blog. I understand why, but...what a sign of the times.

Okay fair point

Got it, so every country should focus on having a mediocre-at-best AI strategy by refusing to work together? Surely this will create a better future instead of pooling resources.

This vaguely-nationalist world view around tech that’s emerging in Europe is dangerous, man.

On the brain drain problem in particular, one way to ensure talent sticks around is to create a good environment for people to do their best work. In much of Europe, getting bureaucracy out of the way and encouraging real investment would go a long way. People leave because they can make more money and they want to be surrounded by the best people. People would trade some of that off to stick around their home countries, however if you go to California and talk to folks from e.g. NL or DE working on this stuff, they have a lot to say about innovation and working culture back home.

God the name was very triggering as someone who worked in the valley 2011-2018 time frame…

When you're successful and rich (enough, at least), this is a nice whimsical thing to say. When you're suffering in the trenches, this isn't very helpful.

I have a really hard time telling if this is despite the current administration’s best efforts, because the current administration’s policies, or just an artifact of government inertia.

Top level: Super excited to witness this in my lifetime.

Edit: Also, my 40 years of life leads me towards the latter category.

I've actually been experimenting with using Ghidra and Opus to create human-consumable, reverse-engineered software. My ultimate dream would be a buildable EverQuest client. Opus does a decent job of pulling out various subsystems and understanding how it works. I was able to get a pretty much working networking layer for instance with less than an hour's work.