boringuser2

Turbo is basically unusable. It doesn't produce code. It produces steps.

LLMs aren't logical machines, so any non-trivial bug-fix is just likely to introduce more bugs.

It's a bit of a misunderstanding of how LLMs are supposed to be used.

One caveat is if you're very untalented, it might be able to solve very common patterns successfully.

I think it's a little questionable to prompt language models with "bugs you're trying to solve".

GPT-4 base = (or slightly better) Claude 3 Opus >>> GPT 3.5 >>> GPT-4 Turbo

If you want to secure the future for your people, you need to execute large government infrastructure programs.

Turns out leaving all of this to the profit motive puts people on the street. Amazing.

Worst case scenario it bends (this takes a lot of abuse) rather than snaps like plywood.

A lot of meh furniture that uses steel will last, too.

What metrics would you prefer? Feelings?

Regarding France, my understanding is that their scores are some of the lowest in Europe and below the OCED average on the PISA exam (comparatively, the United States is above the OCED average), though there might be demographic considerations.

The problem is when the "ordering" of science is horizontal.

I.e. Einstein reading their works and copying their conclusions.

This is highly likely to have happened, regardless of the "completeness" of one work or another.

The thing I like about this is that it levels celebrity (something man-made) with rationality.

Why not reduce Einstein's celebrity? It reflects reality more accurately to do so.

I don't think anything, im referring to allegations.

Right, it's not so much a critique of the author's work that I've presented as much as a meta-commentary on the article in the context that we're posting on a forum that aggregates content for public consumption.

The author is fine, he can publish whatever he pleases. I can't stop him, as you've pointed out.

From a meta-commentary perspective, it is actually quite interesting that Einstein's alleged plagiarism covers many diverse sources.

I like how the concept that third world workers that are exploited by greedy capitalists to undercut native labor are being treated unfairly and exploited is presented as novel.

That's literally why they're there in the first place.

If you want to talk about contributions to the general theory of relativity, why not talk about the people that Einstein is alleged to have plagiarized, Henri Poincaré, David Hilbert and Hendrik Antoon Lorentz?