bonn1
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
50K is not enough to keep operations running, 100K would work with editors from low-wage countries.
But still a bit odd that they ran out of money.
So you never know who will be 'useless' and on conferences you meet so many people in a very short time, that it's ultra efficient. And you get appointments easier because meetings can be quicker.
However, most important with any conference is that you try to get at least 5-10 appointments for a conference which means you have to reach out to min 50
EDIT: ok found it and it's striking, the difference is even more than 1 sec (total loading time)
Just append a "#context"
The OP made his post as objective as possible, politely written and nobody is loosing his face, neither Ruby as a language nor the Ruby community. But people are still resentful and fire back.
I believe it's not a discussion about Ruby anymore, its strengths, its weaknesses and wether Ruby still fits in 2015—no it's the fear of people that their core competence might be less worth in future. That all the time and energy they invested all the years into one language might be not a good investment anymore. The fear that better tech will replace their tech and that they have to start at zero again.
I know I am going to be heavily downvoted for this post. Before you downvote just think a second again why you'll downvote me.
But a DB offers usually persistency and you called your product ForerunnerDB
I still think that the communication/positioning/branding of ForerunnerDB could be improved since it's misleading.
I would disagree here, there is another great resource online for 2 years and showing up as #1 on Google when searching:
Express: yes
Neo4J: why not
Angular: rather not