bojan
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
We have a 100% vibe-coding team, and yes, when they couldn't pass through the CI/CD at some point, they contacted the Ops team and literally said "the agent said the problem is on your side".
And the countries that did the work to rein capitalism in, in a proper way, are doing well, also in the circumstances of globalisation.
But no, getting yourself in a situation where you're dependent on cowboy regimes for critical resources is not good for the people.
There is imho very little to gain from such a move, and potentially a lot to lose. Disconnecting a whole society in such a way would make the total government control even easier.
Edit: typo
Or am I out of the loop and people outside the tech world do use it in a way I'm not aware of?
However changes like these are deeply unpopular as they get interpreted as moving more powers to "Brussels" by right wing media.
North Korea has, like all (formerly and currently) communist countries, a decent education system.
An educated population of 20 million people will easily provide you with a several thousand people needed to develop functioning nuclear weapons. Those you need to feed. The rest may, and do, starve.
Except it doesn't seem the software is getting cheaper for the end user, even though it is arguably getting cheaper to build.
Paradoxically, the costs of running the software seem to keep rising, both for running it on a local machine or as a subscription.
Where I live many people choose 20% earnings penalty, because 80% is enough for all needs.
And we remain very competitive on the global scene, as a society. We ensure we make the most of those 80%.
It's very common where I live. It doesn't seem to affect our GDP or national productivity.
And interestingly enough, you almost never see people who start to work fewer hours choosing to go back to 40 hours.