bobbyi_settv

It's not just --help.

When you checkout a specific commit and are now in detached HEAD state, you are by default given the message

    If you want to create a new branch to retain commits you create, you may
    do so (now or later) by using -c with the switch command. Example:

      git switch -c <new-branch-name>

    Or undo this operation with:

      git switch -

That technique doesn't work (as well) when you want a single "else" block that is used when either of the conditions is false, which I think is pretty common for this sort of conditional

Worse, the klein bottles did nothing to remove my black heads

The Mac equivalent of xclip -i is pbcopy

> Whats the difference between having sex and being a sexual predator?

I don't think it's necessary to answer this because "sexual predator" was literally Noah's description of himself and his behavior (in those words) in the apology post that led to Wizards no longer wanting to work with him.

If I CMD+R on Hacker News, it reloads the page. If I do it on outlook.office.com, it starts drafting a reply to the email I have selected. Reload button does the same thing everywhere.

I guess they're going for technically correct since 100% is indeed "a portion"

As the press release says, menthol was "the last allowable flavor".

It's not the government banning one specific flavor because it is popular with black people. It is the government first banning every flavor except the one popular with black people and now circling back to make the rules uniform.

The fact that it can be unlocked with a picture doesn't mean it has no security.

The main use case for phone locking is that you leave your phone in a cab, a bar or wherever else in public and someone picks it up later. That person isn't going to know who you are and have a picture of you. They're still prevented from being able to take the phone they just saw laying around and go through your emails, etc.

Could this lead to people intentionally violating terms to try to get their account terminated so that they can get money back for every in app purchase, etc, they've ever made?

Did the word "compression" get cut off due to title length? Or is it intentionally being compressed in the original title as a meta-joke? Turns out it's the former

> One of the big open questions is "are APIs copyrightable?" The court skirted that question, and instead focused on whether it was fair use:

Doesn't deciding that it's fair use specifically mean that they think it is copyrightable? The fair use doctrine specifically refers to the use of copyrighted material.