bob_roberts
Joined 5 years ago
Joined 5 years ago
Many a Utopian project began with a premise like this. You can say the same thing about spelling or the calendar, both of which "logically" need reforming.
Nobody is banning traditional pronouns.
Sicily hits 48.8°C, the highest temperature ever recorded in Europe
(I know there's some question about that reading, but the previous record is 48°)
I'd say you're using misogyny to justify what sounds like very typical toxic masculinity.
Because the choice is either to hide important aspects of yourself, or else come out, whether that's explicitly by saying something, or implicitly by your actions.
In my case, if I didn't explicitly come out as nonbinary / trans, the change in my wardrobe and appearance was going to "out" myself regardless. It seemed healthier and emotionally safer to be upfront about it with the people I know.
In your example, a person doesn't have to "come out" as heterosexual, they can just introduce their spouse, or mention who they are dating. Maybe in an ideal world that would be the case for everyone, but it's not today.
That's not a good argument for the left to stop defending trans people's rights.
Having a name for something can be powerful.
If you're stuck on a task, the last thing you want to hear is that it's really simple.
On the other hand, I would write that X is a simpler approach than Y, if I was comparing two possible approaches.