bjohnso5

I think the parent commenter meant as a selectable runtime at deployment time (i.e. directly supported), rather than requiring the bring-your-own-runtime setup that is currently required.

Definitely blocked in my office.

Your subheading text "Build and publish instantly your projects online" reads a little strangely to me. I'd recommend re-wording that to "Build and instantly publish your projects online".

Looks neat, though!

I feel like it was created just to make this sentence possible. Love it!

Thanks, appreciate the updated link

Title is a bit misleading, should be more like "Pinterest announces intent to open-source Teletraan, a tool for code deployments"

EDIT: Xeroday helpfully pointed out that there IS a link to code in another blog post in the same series.

Last year Sean Le Van said he was 13, this year he's 14. Which is it, Sean?!

I think that's debatable... with the currently humongous list of available plugins and it's project-focused interface, I don't think it's much of a stretch at this point to identify it as a lightweight IDE.

I think it's generally abbreviated that way because it's phrased "Shit Outta Luck"

On the landing page, bottom right: "A parody of simulation games for geeks".

Interesting... my corporate firewall flags your site with an adult-and-pornography filter. Did you recently purchase the domain from someone who may have been running a different type of site? :)

WebStorm is a solid javascript IDE, I recommend giving the trial a shot.

In what way is Maven a programming language? Is it simply to disambiguate other XML configuration from the build declarations?

Quick suggestion: rather than having your headers return 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' '*';, you're better off echoing the requesting domain back, so that in the future you'll be able to maintain a whitelist of registered domains. Prevents usage from any-old-domain (though I realize you have authorization already built into some parts of your API).