bjoernw

I would take it more as a comment on the sheer volume of hiring, meaning there was a place for any level of engineer there.

Is it worth optimizing for future output when the life-saving metric during a global pandemic is time-to-first-dose? There are only a few factories in the world that can make something as complex as an mRNA vaccine. There is literally a shortage in glass beakers and shipping lanes are backlogged. These supply chains are very fragile and helping stabilize those would do more for vaccine supply than what's being proposed here.

The real problem limiting supply isn't the manufacturing, it's the supply chain. We now have factories optimized to produce vaccines as fast as the supply chain allows. If we start messing with the supply chains and divert inputs to factories not at the same optimization level then overall output could actually fall.

Maybe that's because 99% is purely held to speculate on the price going up?

So this assumes there is pent-up demand to use BTC as part of smart contracts that is not yet met by WBTC on Ethereum. I don't see anything that would validate that assumption.

I know these letters are probably hard to write but when you do have to write one I think referring to people as "people" instead of "resources" would be better.

Coil and Mozilla working on a web standard together, the fact that we now have a couple of years of examples of digital content creators being de-monitized on ad-supported platforms, and the fact that crypto currencies are more approachable now.

That article is from 2018 :) Check out the mobile wallet XUMM for a solid approach.

Seems consistent with his speech impediment, no?