binderbizingdos
Joined 13 years ago
Joined 13 years ago
My only request would be to focus more on stability. We run it for 1 year now and there were many problems with upgrades and various changing issues with the different versions.
So for us less new features but a better tested Gitlab would be great. Maybe some kind of "stable" release? Not sure...
It will fall apart as all the other systems have and be considered "silly compared to our knew awesome form of rule"
exactly... you need to believe in it because there can't be any proof as long as we can't travel in time.
get over it and recognize that everything that goes beyond the scientific method is mere speculation.
> You have activated Intel vPro technology on the PCs through configuration of the Management Engine BIOS extension (MEBx).1
http://www.vnc.com/products/viewerplus/ViewerPlusUseCases.pd...
I'm on Debian so Unity is far away for me...
Ok, don't make me laugh.
I wonder how much they pay him for writing this stuff.
US = good, China and Russia etc. = bad
oh no, mg is pretty crappy. I use a lot of emacs features and the ones I just need on that file are usually not available.
If I need to choose between mg and vim I'll always use vim, it's far superior than any of these cheap emacs clones.
Use a real Emacs or use Vim... that's it.
I think Gitlab kind of suffers from the Ubuntu syndrome when they were still pushing the non-LTS release as default. Many things were not tested long enough and would cause issues for many people while they were using it.
For example after one upgrade browsing the repos didn't work because apparently the Git version hat to be a specific version. I think this was neither tested nor is the Git version mentioned anywhere as a requisite.
Or with v5.3 the Git satellites would get into an unclean state sometimes and had to be cleaned out manually.
I took quite some time to find this out too.
So my suggestion: more polish and testing and less new features.