bilqis

Not enough. They tried to make them separated their Office software business from the OS business, but failed sadly. Not to mentioned all the problems with them making unsupportable office files formats.

That implies creating market for data, attaching speculative value to it and et cetera, and stinks of web3 bullshit.

Well it’s capitalism. End goal of all actors in this economic system is not public good, it’s profit.

But will that actually be against ToS or copyright? Many people tend to say that copilot learning from OSS doesn’t infringe any copyright and is no different from a person just learning from someone else’s work. So how is it different if copilot is learning from private repositories? Or eg from leaked source code?

They say they don’t

Github also has access to private repositories.

When you’re building housing to make profit, you’re not doing it for public good, you’re doing it to extract profits.

And housing problem exists in places other than USA, with wildly different policies.

Kids may be socially isolated if they’re not present online.

There is a difference between a person learning and a commercial product learning from someone else’s work, probably ignoring all the licenses.

This won’t happen under current state of capitalistic systems. No-one will fund this for sole purpose of public good.

I’m not talking only about this specific tunnel. Norway spends quite a number of their petro dollars to make tunnels in the middle of nowhere to another middle id nowhere.

Petrostate mega projects.

I would expect that a lot of people didn’t click on that article because of clickbaity buzzfeed-style name.

Well, maybe you don’t bribe directly by handing money over to an LEO. But I would say there is still tons of corruption that is based on influence, soft skills, knowing right people, donations to specific charities/political parties.