bigbluedots

Yes, programming language discussions can be vibes-based and therefore low value too, but sometimes the more concrete aspects of the languages at hand, e.g. language features and tradeoffs are discussed. That is something that I'm not seeing in equivalent AI discussions.. there is a lot of how a particular AI model "feels" to interact with.

These threads seem to have become exceedingly vibes-based. Yes, something may now be cheaper or more expensive or whatever, but there is no way to objectively measure quality (except for "trust me bro" benchmarks). So the discourse is people saying that for them, this or that model was better - which is a very low value data point.

Like what? Provide examples please.

Wow That Is Fantastic And I Am So Glad To Hear It, You Have Really Put In A Lot Of Effort!

Enterprise customers care about things like guardrails and data safety. xAI has always been anti guardrails, and who knows if you can trust them with your data.

No company that uses Cursor now is going to be ok with using xAI models.

Not a drop of blood to be seen anywhere!

It might be time to start interacting with agents using grug speak only

Well, you did say all. Is there a minimal set of exposed features that must be exposed for a workflow engine to be included?

Yes, because launching then immersed in something that will greatly increase the launch weight will help...

I'm hoping it's a human with a taste for satire

All hail your new overlords!

That's fine, you do you. Everyone gets to choose for themselves!

Go look it up, he doesn't

Who is "us"? You are not me.