bhelkey
Joined 9 years ago
Joined 9 years ago
I agree that we have huge advantages today. I agree that the best practices, tools, and computing resources are much better today than they were in the past.
But these don't invalidate OP's point.
The article mentions Windows XP which certainly had IE with tabs but the problem predates that.
Earlier versions of Windows (95, 98, 2000) featured a single window per site. So if one wanted 3 "tabs" one would need three separate windows. But the browser windows were not isolated. An issue in one window would impact ALL of the web browser's windows.
In addition, there was some issue with IE in particular. A crash in IE would sometimes make the taskbar and desktop disappear then restart.
More generally, browsers did not have isolation. This made for a much worse user experience.
Software in general used to be much less stable. For example, browsers didn't always have tab isolation. A single bad site could, and frequently would, crash the whole browser.
As all points are within a small radius, these description are very redundant.
Even without flashing a new OS, one can install third party app stores (e.g. F-Droid) with open source apps and/or side-load modified versions of those apps.
[1] https://www.thecityreporter.nyc/2026/04/06/waymo-driverless-...
I am not sure what you mean by "apathetic about tech in general" but my experience has been that folks who go to makerspaces are excited about making things in the physical world. That tends to carry over to tech that empowers them to do so (e.g. 3d printers, CNC machines, laser cutters, ...).
Your mileage may vary.
Two things that I did not anticipate:
1: Refresh time is a lot longer for color displays (~20s) as compared to black and white displays (~0.5s).
2: Stock images tend to use cartoons. There is a reason for that. These displays require dithering which seems to work a lot better with a limited color palette, flat areas, and bold edges.
[1] https://www.waveshare.com/13.3inch-e-paper-hat-plus-e.htm
Turns out tabs were added in IE 7 [1] about 2/3rds of the way through Windows XP's lifecycle.
> Like I said, technologies were just being invented... Each new version was better than the one before. Can you say that now?
That is largely what the article is saying. Software is getting worse BUT software improved by leaps and bounds for quite a while. These improvements compounded over time meaning that new software (while regressing) is still much better than software from the 1990s and 2000s.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Explorer_7