beachstartup

Joined 13 years ago

Karma
4,364
Submissions
2,421
Member since
Feb 27
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 9 years ago
seems like the way ikea classifies their furniture is merely a suggestion. for example i've always used their dining tables as desks, as their "desks" are too small and flimsy and relatively expensive.
Comment · 9 years ago
a lot of rich people in brazil drive cheap/lower end cars because carjacking and literal highway robberies are a huge problem.
Comment · 9 years ago
it's supposed to be negative. it's shit talk on the internet.
Comment · 9 years ago
> why people agree to those terms is beyond me.

rich people are susceptible to the same herd/exclusivity psychology the rest of us are.

to those who don't know, fund management firms have plenty of sales people, except they're not called sales people, they're called VPs, managing directors, partners, etc. but their job is to sell their services and bring new assets (MONEY) under management. they do this through social interaction and posturing. a lot of these people don't even actually manage the money, they just outsource it to hedge funds and banks with high end management services. they're constantly being wined and dined by bankers and traders, people they claim to hate yet they keep shoveling money in their direction. hmm.

why else do you think they have "minimum" asset requirements? there's no logical reason to have one -- once your client's money is in your pocket you can shift it around from a single pool of capital no matter how big or small the transaction. which is basically what an ETF is. there's software to keep track of all the individual deposits and returns. the truth is they market that exclusivity and they sure as hell don't want to talk with anyone who doesn't have millions of dollars. i can't say i blame them.

one thing they all have in common is they all look down their noses at "retail" financial services. it's just a big social game played by very smart people, like venture capital.

Comment · 9 years ago
the promise of future (or one-time "special") dividends or buyout or merger or some other action resulting in a swap for stock that does pay.

it's pretty tenuous, but real nonetheless.

Comment · 9 years ago
this is another data point that supports my personal, hare-brained theory that the expectation of privacy on the internet is simply naive, a fool's errand. it never existed, and never will.

this is despite (or maybe because) of my best efforts to secure systems as a major part of my job.

Comment · 9 years ago
it seems to me you'd have to know at a minimum:

1. every tag pattern that triggers the bug(s)

2. which broken pages with that pattern were requested at an abnormally high frequency or had an unusually short TTL (or some other useful heuristic)

3. on which servers, and at what time, in order to tell

4. who's data lived on the same servers at the same time as those broken pages

to even begin to estimate the scope of the leak. and that doesn't even help you find who planted the bad seeds.

Comment · 9 years ago
requesting a page with a specific combination of broken tags, when done through cloudflare, will cause neighboring memory to be dumped into the response. op suspects this is due to a bounds checking bug on a read or copy. one can imagine this can be potentially kilobytes of data in one go.

since anyone can put a broken page behind cloudflare, all you need to do is request your own broken page through cloudflare, and start collecting the random "secure" data that comes back.

Comment · 9 years ago
Comment · 9 years ago
i'll say it again, just in case you didn't get it the first time:

illegal aliens are different than legal immigrants, and should be treated differently under the law, and in society.

frankly, i don't care what the republicans or steve bannon think about it, that's apparently a major concern of yours, but isn't one of mine.

Comment · 9 years ago
i'm saying that legal and illegal immigration are two different things. the fact that steve bannon dislikes both types and probably (almost certainly) dislikes non-white people has nothing to do with my point.

let's say all your worst fears are true, and bannon secretly is literally hitler. does that change the fact that legal vs. illegal immigrants are different, and should be treated differently, with a different set of laws and social acceptance? because i would say that even if he is literally hitler and mussolini combined, that would still hold true.

i mean, what is your actual point here? that you don't like steve bannon? okay, great.

Comment · 9 years ago
wow, i must suck at writing because you just made the same point i did.

namely: legal and illegal immigration are completely different things and anyone who says otherwise is disregarding law and social norms.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton