Recent submissions

Comment · 12 years ago
No, at some point between $0 and $400,000,000[1], negligence is no longer an acceptable excuse.

[1] The current market value of the claimed 700k BTC loss in USD.

Comment · 12 years ago
Listed under "Assets": "New brand and services ready to be launched."

Just what the community needs most - new Gox-quality services, hidden behind brand obfuscation. Ready to go!

Comment · 12 years ago
I love the way this API is presented on the page. It's awesome. It exposes itself in such an obvious way that it leaves no question about its capabilities and usage. Makes me want to jump right in.
Comment · 13 years ago
> "[The U.S. patent system] is not obliged to register change in ownership."

That I hadn't known; the implication being, if you intend to leverage a patent with lawful permission from its licensor, it's still possible to get screwed (by being misled about the rightful owner's identity, for instance).

Comment · 13 years ago

  BBRY Market cap today: $4.3 bn
  Cash: "about $2.6 bn in cash"
  Patents: "estimate [...] between $1 bn and $3 bn"
That leaves not a whole lot of value in the company's other assets after the cash and patents - their personnel, supply chains and branding are valued at almost zero in the market. I'm kind of amazed by that.
Comment · 13 years ago
It's easy to dump on PMA, but what it was built for, it did (and mostly, does) excellently.

When I used PMA for the first time I was a very young programmer, and it really amazed me that such a tool could exist. Oddly enough, this was a really inspirational piece of software for me.

Comment · 13 years ago
This article reads like a general argument against government subsidies in general - replace "STEM education" with "corn" or "new energy" and the argument is still valid.

Given that it was published on nature.com, best known as the publisher of one of the top science journals in the world, I would bet that the intended purpose is to stimulate discussion, not to explicitly endorse this view as written.

Comment · 13 years ago
Among my recent favorites:

"Hello NULL," -- from Leap Motion

"I wanted to follow up after meeting you" -- from "Developer Relations Team" (not a person!? did I meet the entire team?) at SendGrid

Comment · 13 years ago
I received 15 emails in 10 days when I signed up for Full Contact. Yeah, I wanted to check out your product, so I signed up and tested it out. No, I don't need to be reminded that you exist every sixteen hours.

I had, separately, been discussing one of the less common features at Full Contact with a real person there, and pointed this out to him, forwarding all of the emails back to him as well. He apologized sincerely and helped figure out why this was happening (over email, of course :) ).

It's just an insanely reliable way to turn my opinion from 'this product is intriguing' to 'this product is irritating.'

If you're going to send email spam (and most startups have to, at some point), at least make it pleasant.

Comment · 13 years ago
I gotta be honest, I can't figure out how to use this.

I imported my Google Reader data (or so I am led to believe), but all I see is a generic feed full of (admittedly interesting, but not what I want) generic news stories. I see a way of adding 'interests' but not 'feeds'.

My confusion is somewhat assuaged by the awesome '/people' page.

Is this a Reader replacement, or a Reader poaching?

--

[edit: I see that this tool does not include an RSS reader, which I thought it would based on the invitation screen. This does not do anything that I use Google Reader for... which is to read RSS feeds!]

Comment · 13 years ago
In Windows, 'X' "makes no sense", while in OS X, 'X' is "clear." Okay, got it :).
Comment · 13 years ago
To play devil's advocate, let's consider that it might actually be important to push new icons into the public icon lexicon.

Right now I'm typing this comment in a browser window that has three icons at the top right: a little line like this _, two layered squares []], and an X. What do those do? Obviously, they minimize, 'restore', and close the window. Why 'obviously'? These symbols are not intrinsically 'obvious'. They have become a standard since roughly the days of Windows 3.1. We expect them to be there, and I prefer the icons to a little status bar that says "Minimize, Restore, Close."

Then there are three icons below that, a left-facing arrow (<-), a right-facing arrow (->) and an arrow that loops back on itself in a circle. Again, the meanings are 'obvious', insofar as they are not obvious but are part of the public icon lexicon. It can be said this is "common knowledge" that these represent the 'navigate back', 'navigate forward', and 'reload' functionalities of my browser.

How did these icons become standard? Through initial experimentation, then widespread acceptance and propagation.

The good ideas caught on, and bad ones were lost to the sands of time. There are some crappy icons out there that didn't make it.

Consider a recent example - the share icon[1]. A decade ago this thing didn't exist. Now it's everywhere. It's beginning to become commonplace. These days, many applications have a basic 'share' functionality, and few use an icon that looks different from this. So is it a standard at this point? Maybe.

[1] https://www.google.com/search?q=share+icon

Comment · 13 years ago
Caution --

"Request access to the prototype" yielded an immediate email: "Thank you for signing up for a New York Times newsletter!"

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton