bartlettD
Joined 4 years ago
Joined 4 years ago
https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?aggFilters=phase:3,status:...
The thing about bubbles is, you can often easily spot them, but can't so easily say when they'll pop.
Theres an interesting article by Mike Engelhardt (author of LTspice) which gives hints on the details of their implementation.
https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/tech...
>The 100nF value for decoupling became so entrenched because it works well enough* most of the time, so you don’t need to even think about it. By eliminating trivialities you can focus your brain-juices, spoons, or whatever else you want to call them on more challenging tasks.
So the argument in this article is that we should ignore this triviality and spend more time precisely tuning decoupling capacitor selection on top of designing the rest of the system?
Software people would call this premature optimisation, no?
I've also heard, possibly apocryphally, that in the old days when we used harsher chemical etchants, removing all of the copper from unused sections of the PCB would increase the risk of thinning the traces beyond what was intended. So in those cases a copper pour would reduce the time the PCB would need to spend in the etchant bath.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-48534-4 (Open-Access)
I had wondered why they weren't doing this in simulation but didn't realise that Finite Element Analysis gets weird in the regions they're exploring.
Reminds me a lot of the "Chemputer" concept for automated chemical synthesis expriments. https://www.chem.gla.ac.uk/cronin/
Regardless of the sophistication of the deepfake, surely this rings huge alarm bells, right? I'm not even sure I'd be comfortable making secret transactions on instruction from my boss. Even if your boss is actually asking you to do this, how can you have the financial authority to transfer $25M and not the savvy to think that being asked to transfer huge amounts of money in secret isn't going to result in you getting thrown under the bus?
If you need wiring harnesses or other cable assemblies you'd usually make them yourself, buy a COTS cable that is close enough and make your design match that or bite the bullet and go to a fabricator and pay expensive Non Recurring Engineering (NRE) costs. Anyone good will have an IPC-A-620 certificate.
Unless you're Toyota, its probably worth buying your own set of crimp tools rather than going down this route. WireViz is a great tool for documenting cables for your own purposes, but is only part of what would make up a full drawing pack for a wire harness.
Unless you're doing scientific computing, Fortran is effectively dead.