barryrandall

Python's ping3 package also encodes this knowledge in LLM-accessible form.

I'm not looking forward to _that_ CAPTCHA.

Then they'd have two problems: people camping out in the stores and managing thousands of printers.

Because enough people will pay $200 for a "premium" HDMI cable, that a market for premium HDMI cables exists.

It's not a person in the chat, it's an account. The account is usually controlled by the person associated with it, but you can't assume that it's always controlled by that person.

All the more reason the elected need to experience it.

One could assume that the previous priority was "grow the app catalog through the use of a permissive listing model," and it's changed to "improve the quality of the app catalog by being more selective about who and what is allowed to be listed."

Please note that this isn't a call for investments or request for startups.

Never present an option you wouldn't want to live with. The internet teaches us that what "nobody should ever do" isn't obvious to everyone all the time.

IIRC, nerds were the primary drivers of the search engine wars.

How many of these would it take to drive down property values in a neighborhood?

Policy is a political issue.

But for modernity's sake, the site needs to add 100 MB of poorly-understood and maintained JavaScript dependencies that break the behavior you're describing so that it can be done entirely in JS.

Someone has to pay, but there's no requirement that someone gets to take a percentage as profit.

What's the percentage?