bangaladore

Yup, I read "— think Cargo, but for C/C++." and closed the tab.

> Microsofts esteemed moat (office) is “Web only” on the lowest tier.

If you've ever used it before, you'd quickly come to the conclusion that web only Office is only useful for someone writing essays for school.

The moment you need to do anything more complex than that, the document renders completely differently on web vs app-- not to mention there are tons of critical features that aren't even available on the web version.

There is a license blurb in the readme.

> This code, apart from the source in core/third-party, is licensed under the MIT License, see LICENSE in this repository.

> The English-language models are also released under the MIT License. Models for other languages are released under the Moonshine Community License, which is a non-commercial license.

> The code in core/third-party is licensed according to the terms of the open source projects it originates from, with details in a LICENSE file in each subfolder.

What's the point of posting what is clearly an AI generated comment.

Afaik Anthropic is not giving pretty much any provider model weights, so any inference of Opus is certainly not private. Either going through Anthropic or Bedrock, or Vertex.

Of the three Bedrock is probably the best for trust, but still not private by any means.

Another common tell nowadays is the apostrophe type (’ vs ').

I don't know personally how to even type ’ on my keyboard. According to find in chrome, they are both considered the same character, which is interesting.

I suspect some word processors default to one or the other, but it's becoming all too common in places like Reddit and emails.

> That's the beauty of constraint-based parametric modeling as opposed to, say, modeling in Blender.

I was thinking the same thing. This looks more like an API that makes 3d modeling look closer to CAD, but without realizing that CAD is about constraints, parametrizing, and far more.

CSP is inherently a client-side browser security feature, so yes.

That's certainly one of the things to be concerned with. Not certain how that's implemented, but I can still see there being holes in that strategy.

True. I suspect they will ban you depending on refusal frequency and severity.

Very much so. It feels like it can't have been that common in the original training corpus. Probably more common now given that we are training slop generators with slop.

More concerned (for the author) of someone trying to host/show illegal material. AI guardrails can only be so effective.

So SFT cost less only low hundreds of dollars? (1-10$ per hour per H100 if I'm seeing this correctly).

What about SFT?

Presumably basing this of Qwen is the reason it can be done for so cheap?

It doesn't help that the TPM spec is so full of optional features (and the N spec versions), so it's often annoying to find out what the vendor even supports without signing an NDA + some.

TPMs work great when you have a mountain of supporting libraries to abstract them from you. Unfortunately, that's often not the case in the embedded world.