bandoti

Curious to see how this goes. It seems to me it’s hard to match reality—for example, books, book shelves, pencils, drafting tables, gizmos, keyboards, mouse, etc. Things with tactile feedback. Leafing through a book typeset on nice paper will always be a better experience than the best of digital representations.

AR will always be somewhat awkward until you can physically touch and interact with the material things. It’s useful, sure, but not a replacement.

Haptic feedback is probably my favorite iPhone user experience improvement on both the hardware and software side.

However, I will never be able to type faster than on my keyboard, and even with the most advanced voice inputs, I will always be able to type longer and with less fatigue than if I were to use my voice—having ten fingers and one set of vocal cords.

All options are going to be valid and useful for a very long time.

Agreed. I think engineers though following simple Test-Driven Development procedures can write the code, unit tests, integration tests, debug, etc for a small enough unit by default forces tight feedback loops. AI may assist in the particulars, not run the show.

I’m willing to bet, short of droid-speak or some AI output we can’t even understand, that when considering “the system as a whole”, that even with short-term gains in speed, the longevity of any product will be better with real people following current best-practices, and perhaps a modest sprinkle of AI.

Why? Because AI is trained on the results of human endeavors and can only work within that framework.

Here’s a few problems I foresee:

1. People get lazy when presented with four choices they had no hand in creating, and they don’t look over the four and just click one, ignoring the others. Why? Because they have ten more of these on the go at once, diminishing their overall focus.

2. Automated tests, end-to-end sim., linting, etc—tools already exist and work at scale. They should be robust and THOROUGHLY reviewed by both AI and humans ideally.

3. AI is good for code reviews and “another set of eyes” but man it makes serious mistakes sometimes.

An anecdote for (1), when ChatGPT tries to A/B test me with two answers, it’s incredibly burdensome for me to read twice virtually the same thing with minimal differences.

Code reviewing four things that do almost the same thing is more of a burden than writing the same thing once myself.

The thing is though, this story is a metaphor for life we’re living right now. Consider up in Canada the paper mills that were built near water streams, dumping mercury into indigenous people's food.

Many of which corporations exploited and/or mislead chiefs into believing the project would be safe.

Same premise, different package.

Given this anecdote I can imagine doctors having AI access to a network of the latest studies will certainly help better inform everyone.

Ultimately, doctors are the experts doing the studies, but AI being there to help will certainly add value.

Avoiding any percentage of misdiagnoses is a huge win and time saver.

Only time will tell! But it’s worth a try.

Personally, I don’t bother searching because I only consume the headlines, on other news sites too, come to think of it. There’s lots of interesting things people post but frankly I’d rather pay for a good book on any subject.

hides from the dreaded downvoters

I used to spend more time browsing when reading an actual newspaper or magazine. The discourse on opinion pieces and such is more thought out too—many people, myself included, post too quickly before thinking because we’re always on the go.

Something about the online experience consuming news is less satisfying. Perhaps a hacker out there can set up a print version of HN archives, and print it on a Gutenberg Press. :)

Lots of nice thoughts that I agree with. But there is a lot of value creation in AI as well, beyond building things.

For example, how can doctors save time and spend more time one-on-one with patients? Automate the time-consuming, business-y tasks and that’s a win. Not job loss but potential quality of life improvement for the doctors! And there are many understaffed industries.

The balancing point will be reached. For now we are in early stages. I’m guessing it’ll take at least a decade or two for THE major breakthrough—whatever that may be. :)

Please consider some folks might be new to A*, and perhaps even HN, so maybe this is the first time they’ve seen it! :)

Also, I have ten books on perspective drawing, and my understanding isn’t complete without all ten of them

Or, if I’m teaching a subject on A*, perhaps ONE of those articles conveys the materials best for my students.

Thank you for providing links to the others though! I’m sure it will be helpful for someone.

This is too much for me now haha.

A restaurant menu contains hamburgers, hotdogs, meatballs. A UI menu is represented by abstract icons of the items contained within a restaurant menu.

Now I am starting to like the hamburger menu after all… perhaps more as satire though. :)

For what it’s worth, ellipsis is the best of the bunch, because it means the same thing as in the written language, and is concise enough to use as a button that suggests what the action does.

I understand and agree to an extent with common use.

However, it stands that language is more specific and unambiguous—thus better suited to communicate an action.

There’s also the problem of the plethora of OTHER icons which use horizontal bars to cause even more cognitive load.

And then, there are many people who have not learned hamburger menu since childhood, and thus the burden is even greater!