bananzamba

That stuff is so easy to ignore I struggle to understand how it could make it unusable

Just build all new datacenters near underwater volcanoes and you got scaling

The logical conclusion of piracy and AI reverse engineering is that mire and more games will become streaming exclusives

How are they trusting Google not to destill them

The difference is with European data stored by American companies

Also doesn't the very good ARC AGI 2 score of GPT-6 Astra kinda contradict this, since each problem is its own game with very different rules

But that lead happened to be the same approach Levent and Tristan had found...

Meaning they would have found it first if OpenAI hadn't spent millions in compute on following their lead to its conclusion faster than them.

The accusation is that they stole his approach of solving it. If OpenAI didn't bruteforce it with dozens of agents, he would have solved Navier-Stokes eventually since he evidently had the right approach. So knowing which approach to take makes all the difference, if they didn't know the approach they couldn't have solved it.

It's like he had a treasure map and was about to find the treasure, but they copied his treasure map and scooped him with a faster boat and found the treasure first. But he would have found it if it weren't for them.

It's a reference to Bob the builder, the children's TV show. You know, because AI IDEs help you build stuff

The angry version is even more obviously AI

I've started the same, but instead of the gym I go to random meetup events. Which feels easier since most of them are exactly for talking to strangers. Also went bars sometimes with people from the group. I have to get more confident about exchanging contact information though, only did that twice.

User Were there people in opposition of automatization and industrialization? And if so, what were their reasons?

talkie-1930 Yes, there were people who objected to the introduction of machinery, on the ground that it would deprive the working classes of employment. It was argued that, as the new methods of production must necessarily lower the cost of articles, and so increase consumption, more would be produced than the country could take, and that a surplus of manufactured goods would be left on hand, which would oblige the manufacturers to discharge a portion of their hands. The opponents of machinery also predicted, that the operative classes would be reduced to starvation, in consequence of the cheapness of articles of food, which would enable foreigners to undersell the home producer in the home market. They contended, further, that the mental cultivation of the artizan must suffer from his constant application to a purely mechanical process; and, finally, they maintained, that the proposed system must have a demoralizing effect, as it would remove all inducements to personal exertion, and substitute a state of things, in which the industrious and the idle would fare alike.

Or like Meshico

If you need equality, just use fixed point