bakedbeanz

Yeah, I figured as much.

Care to expand on this implication?

Weird, joyless take. What do you get out of looking down on people appreciating a cute animal?

> It applies not just to access to information on the device, but information "which can be accessed by the use of that computer"

So... basically the entire internet, then?

Snide viewpoints like this are one of the main reasons people with mental illness often hide their conditions and suffer in silence.

Oh, you have the gall to mention how depression or anxiety manifests in your life? You better stop flaunting your psychological frailty!

How is providing a fake email "debugging"... ?

Researchers associated with UMN intentionally submitted patches to the Linux kernel with vulnerabilities in them as an experiment. OSS maintainers shouldn't have to be the unwitting test subjects of experiments and have their time wasted (or worse, have vulnerabilities make it into their source code) so that researchers can write a paper about it.

It makes sense for them to want to keep their customers happy, considering how goddamn expensive those little bits of plastic are

You can take anything and do it poorly. That's not the fault of the people who created it.

"brew fucking sucks" is just whining, not reasonable criticism IMHO

Your anecdote is also just an anecdote. You're making sweeping claims without evidence and are adding nothing of substance to the discussion.

> One thing I always try and vouch for is that you do need to go "all-in" on microservices

Did you mean "don't need"? I agree with the rest of your post, but this first sentence confuses me

Ah, but of course you are one of The Smart People whereas we plebians (and the NASA scientists who designed and launched the probe) are merely average.