axau
Joined 8 years ago
Joined 8 years ago
This would be extremely surprising to me. Citation needed.
I'm sure you knew that though. What exactly is your point? Would you like me to rewrite my original post in fully specified legalese just so you can't nitpick? :P
What a horrible precedent.
I’m also not convinced by a “don’t worry the camera is bad” argument; looking at drone footage online it seems to have plenty of resolution to distinguish people in one’s backyard, for example, and I’d expect those to only get better over time.
- you're in the middle of nowhere
- you're doing it exclusively on a property you own (and the property is large enough)
- the use case is in the public good (e.g.: police can use guns)
In other cases, the downsides are large given potential for abuse/voyeurism/sabotage, and upsides seem nil.