aussiegreenie

>Are we really pretending it's equivalent?

Yes, it is equivalent if you live anywhere but America.

Take two failing companies, each with a huge debt load and combine them to form a larger failing company with even a worst debt profile.

The short sellers of SpaceX have reportedly made over $15 billion already.

Tesla is heading south in a serious way.

The Americans may ban the use of the Chinese models in America. But like the Chinese car ban, everyone else will use them.

So Polymarket did marketing....what a shock.

I love how the bonds are rated above junk.

It is not running on either but Seedance, so who cares?

Whose taste...

When your business model directly breaks the law, and the laws are enforced, it hard to have a business,

>AI Grifters Are Making Anti-Data Center Slop With AI

As compared to AI Grifters Are Making Pro-Data Center Slop With AI

How quickly can we get the movie?

The US capital markets are closer to Putin's Russia than to free markets.

Historically, listing rules asked: "How much money did you make last year, and do you fit our standard corporate governance box?"

Today, NASDAQ's rules ask: "Do you have the massive market capitalisation, sufficient institutional public float, and transparent liquidity to ensure fair and orderly trading?"

Here are the obvious ones:

1. Free float - Every company that intended to list was required to have at least 20% free float.

2. Index weights were based on the free float.

3. Time before inclusion into the Indices (min 12 months) now 15 trading days

4. Lockup period - minimum 12 months up to 24 months - not 180 days.

I wish people would understand that if America had a functioning criminal justice system, no one would have heard Elon Musk nor Donald Trump.

He already has NZ citizenship.

When I read the title, I thought companies were trying to hide the fact that they are using AI due to backlash.

Yes. Competition is not the goal.