attende_domine

Joined 8 years ago

Karma

Submissions

Member since

Nov 15

Recent submissions

Promising project, but keyboard internationalization is a mess. It's unusable for those using non-English keyboard layouts.

https://github.com/lapce/lapce/issues/2244

https://github.com/lapce/lapce/issues/1094

https://github.com/lapce/lapce/issues/1689

https://github.com/lapce/lapce/issues/2731

Comment · 4 years ago

Utrecht, but yes.

Comment · 5 years ago

  % ping whatsapp.com
  ping: whatsapp.com: Name or service not known
  % ping web.whatsapp.com
  ping: web.whatsapp.com: Name or service not known
  % ping facebook.com
  ping: facebook.com: Name or service not known
  % ping instagram.com
  PING instagram.com (31.13.65.174) 56(84) bytes of data.
  64 bytes from 31.13.65.174 (31.13.65.174): icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=110 ms

Comment · 8 years ago

Of course Fred had bills to pay as well, but on the whole his motivations were certainly overwhelmingly altruistic. Read his Wikipedia page[1] to get an idea of what drove him to produce Mr. Rogers. Here's an excerpt:

>Trained and ordained as a minister, Rogers was displeased with the way television addressed children. He began to write and perform local Pittsburgh-area shows for youth. In 1968, Eastern Educational Television Network began nationwide distribution of Rogers's new show on WQED. Over the course of three decades, Rogers became a television icon of children's entertainment and education.

>Rogers advocated various public causes. In the Betamax case, the U.S. Supreme Court cited Rogers's prior testimony before a lower court in favor of fair-use television show recording (now called time shifting). Rogers also testified before a U.S. Senate committee to advocate for government funding of children's television.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Rogers

Comment · 8 years ago

Interesting home page https://thebeez.home.xs4all.nl/

Comment · 8 years ago

>Originally, usury meant interest of any kind.[0]

For example, here's Aristotle on usury[1]:

>There are two sorts of wealth-getting, as I have said; one is a part of household management, the other is retail trade: the former necessary and honorable, while that which consists in exchange is justly censured; for it is unnatural, and a mode by which men gain from one another. The most hated sort, and with the greatest reason, is usury, which makes a gain out of money itself, and not from the natural object of it. For money was intended to be used in exchange, but not to increase at interest. And this term interest, which means the birth of money from money, is applied to the breeding of money because the offspring resembles the parent. Wherefore of an modes of getting wealth this is the most unnatural.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usury

[1] http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/politics.1.one.html

Comment · 8 years ago

C. S. Lewis on interest (from Mere Christianity):

>There is one bit of advice given to us by the ancient heathen Greeks, and by the Jews in the Old Testament, and by the great Christian teachers of the Middle Ages, which the modern economic system has completely disobeyed. All these people told us not to lend money at interest: and lending money at interest — what we call investment — is the basis of our whole system. Now it may not absolutely follow that we are wrong. Some people say that when Moses and Aristotle and the Christians agreed in forbidding interest (or “usury” as they called it), they could not foresee the joint stock company, and were only dunking of the private moneylender, and that, therefore, we need not bother about what they said.

>That is a question I cannot decide on. I am not an economist and I simply do not know whether the investment system is responsible for the state we are in or not. This is where we want the Christian economist. But I should not have been honest if I had not told you that three great civilizations had agreed (or so it seems at first sight) in condemning the very thing on which we have based our whole life.