askafriend
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
He currently still has $10B under management.
What's the point of posting blatantly wrong details? It's pretty easy to look them up.
For example, doing it at Columbia is meaningful. Doing it at a random school, not so much.
In fact, the returns were so astronomical that they took a $35B loss (around 67%) which means they were still UP 80% for the year in 2026.
Today they have around $10B under management.
As an investor, how would you feel about being up 80% for the year? Exactly. They're having a phenomenal year.
After he got fired, he wrote a 165 page thesis on AI in early 2024 that all ended up becoming true in 2026; you can read it for yourself and be the judge: https://situational-awareness.ai
That's what he based the fund on.
It's generational foresight not available to 99.999999999999999999% of 25 year olds. I want to get ahead of the default cynicism and "oh it's just dumb luck woe is me" aspect of HN.
Humans are perfectly capable of this themselves and in fact often do it...
I'm not paying for the food. I'm paying for them to bring me the food. Those are two different products.