asdfaoeu

Nothing saying you can't influence just not improperly.

It'd be interesting if the strategy would change without the auction rule. I don't think I've ever played with that.

It for whitehat third parties who discover unprotected keys obviously people intentionally stealing keys will not revoke them generally.

Lobbying is definitely not an exclusive American thing.

Lobbying is also different to bribery even if some bribery is done under the label of lobbying.

For 1 Australia just spent ten years in that world before it was reverted because of the prevalence of card surcharges everywhere.

Why should HN be allowed to have rules on what content is allowed to be posted? People are of course free to not post.

AWS and similar already have service quotas that cap these.

We aren't talking about a calculator web service though we are talking about the Linux kernel and if there's a bug in the kernel that could conceivably cause a crash in an otherwise correctly written application then that would be a CVE in the kernel.

It's not hard to imagine an application for which 1+1 = 3 leads to security issue.

Let's say they do and only 5% are "security issues" you still need to update either way.

How has conservative changed?

It sounds like they didn't agree to that but anyone can propose a settlement.

I don't think they are disputing it was blocked more the reason was copyright not other reasons.

Blackhat markets will always be able to pay better. Selling to Google though you aren't chancing jail time.

I don't think they are saying it's trivial but compare say for example switching an organisation from Office or Windows the example that started this. They are not even in the same ballpark.