artyom
Joined 13 years ago
Joined 13 years ago
We kinda-in-the-spectrum fathers of young girls are something else. Finding out at your 40s-ish that sometimes people wants to talk to "just talk" is kind of embarrassing.
The problem is the assumption that I'm obliged to endure such long pointless conversation. I'll need a very strong reason (e.g. you're literally my daughter), or I'd just leave.
No matter your political inclination, overabusing green cards to import cheap labor in detriment of the American wage is not even a secret: everybody does it. So the claim is, at least, correct in its formulation.
However:
- It doesn't include Amazon, the biggest offender by far?
- Suspends green cards but not H1Bs? so what the point is exactly? replacing cheap labor, for a potential revolving door of cheap labor? make sure cheap labor is never guaranteed to stay, so they don't dare to think about not being cheap anymore?
- People really thought that Microsoft was different to Tata in methodology and discipline? Did you really have to interact with people in either company? I did, and let me tell you, "highly skilled" or even "skilled at all" is nothing short of an exaggeration.
However the risks compared to physical jobs are not even close, they're at two different levels.
There's many, many things that can kill you instantly in the trades. Then there's stuff that may ruin your body no matter how careful you are.
Example: doing roofing means you're walking in a sloped plan all day long, every day. After 20 or 30 years, you'd barely have usable knees.
But now that you're asking:
It's the ones that need to make wild claims like that your brain is obsolete so they can continue operating at a huge loss.
It's the ones that have multi-year investments in data centers so would very much love a discount on the trades price tag.
It's the ones that want to monopolize and control the price and value of intellectual work.
It's the ones that have been claiming that engineers will be out of a job in 3 months for the past 3 years.
I can keep going but I think that's enough.
However the main point is: just pay attention to who is telling you to get a job in the trades instead of a knowledge one.
In my experience corporate box checkers don't care about reasoning (much less "encryption") at all, they see it as an annoying blocker in their path to the next promotion.
This is very likely the case. And if it is, then it's a lost battle. You simply can't reason with that kind of corporate people, let alone have an argument around this level of complexity. Kafka (the writer, not the message broker) predicted this 100 years ago.
When going through the article, my instinct was changing from "annoying" to "this really sounds like a Python 2/3 moment for Git" to finally "oof this is going to be a mess" in the libraries/submodules part.
It's certainly not like I remember it in the 80s, but still happens a lot, and my uninformed take is: "community" in the US was never that cohesive, it only took so much to make it fall apart.
About a year ago there was a "Show HN" post (can't find it now) and the SteamDB guy won the internet that day.
He went into details on how running SteamDB wasn't much of a trouble and it was mostly eye candy on top of the Steam API, in some VPS for $100/mo total, and little maintenance (apparently the Steam APIs are fairly stable).
If he wants to cash it and check out, fine by me, you can't blame him.
Recently, Sonnet 5.5 got quite good, too, but not at the level of Opus/Fable for complex geometry
Disclaimer: I use it for very precise 3D printing, not woodwork.